Skip to content

Cosmetic filters flatbuffers #505

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: 0.11.x
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

atuchin-m
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@atuchin-m atuchin-m self-assigned this Aug 13, 2025
@atuchin-m atuchin-m force-pushed the cosmetic-filter-fb-v6 branch 2 times, most recently from 7818ee6 to d5190b8 Compare August 13, 2025 18:06
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rust Benchmark

Benchmark suite Current: 2cecafe Previous: 5f5fe77 Ratio
rule-match-browserlike/brave-list 2226818763 ns/iter (± 14134997) 2234242439 ns/iter (± 24252201) 1.00
rule-match-first-request/brave-list 1138764 ns/iter (± 7776) 991058 ns/iter (± 5882) 1.15
blocker_new/brave-list 155603458 ns/iter (± 1731560) 149229467 ns/iter (± 2125308) 1.04
blocker_new/brave-list-deserialize 19852541 ns/iter (± 426746) 60347926 ns/iter (± 2771489) 0.33
memory-usage/brave-list-initial 10072827 ns/iter (± 3) 18831613 ns/iter (± 3) 0.53
memory-usage/brave-list-initial/max 64817658 ns/iter (± 3) 64817658 ns/iter (± 3) 1
memory-usage/brave-list-initial/alloc-count 1534760 ns/iter (± 3) 1515544 ns/iter (± 3) 1.01
memory-usage/brave-list-1000-requests 2516487 ns/iter (± 3) 2505592 ns/iter (± 3) 1.00
memory-usage/brave-list-1000-requests/alloc-count 66641 ns/iter (± 3) 66139 ns/iter (± 3) 1.01
url_cosmetic_resources/brave-list 204199 ns/iter (± 989) 207675 ns/iter (± 3578) 0.98
cosmetic-class-id-match/brave-list 16225855 ns/iter (± 4936651) 4286289 ns/iter (± 1184085) 3.79

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'Rust Benchmark'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.10.

Benchmark suite Current: 2cecafe Previous: 5f5fe77 Ratio
rule-match-first-request/brave-list 1138764 ns/iter (± 7776) 991058 ns/iter (± 5882) 1.15
cosmetic-class-id-match/brave-list 16225855 ns/iter (± 4936651) 4286289 ns/iter (± 1184085) 3.79

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

@atuchin-m atuchin-m force-pushed the cosmetic-filter-fb-v6 branch from d5190b8 to c8e0ffb Compare August 13, 2025 18:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant